Obama's skeletons just keep falling out of the closet, along with his buddies!
Barney Frank Hit Over Boyfriend’s Fannie Mae Role
Body: Critics are crying “conflict of interest” over Democratic Rep. Barney Frank’s live-in relationship with Fannie Mae executive Herb Moses while Frank was on the House Banking Committee.
Moses was Fannie Mae’s assistant director for product initiatives from 1991 to 1998.
He was also openly gay Frank’s live-in boyfriend during that time, while the Massachusetts lawmaker was on the committee that had jurisdiction over government-sponsored Fannie Mae, Fox News’ Bill Sammon reported.
Now that Fannie Mae is at the center of the recent financial meltdown, the relationship is coming under increased scrutiny.
“It’s absolutely a conflict,” said Dan Gainor, vice president of the Business & Media Institute.
“He was voting on Fannie Mae at a time when he was involved with a Fannie Mae executive.
How is that not germane?
“But everyone wants to avoid it because he’s gay. It’s the quintessential double standard.
A top Republican House aide told Fox News: “He writes housing and banking laws and his boyfriend is a top exec at a firm that stands to gain from those laws? No media ever take note?”
Frank and Moses met in 1987 and lived together in Washington, D.C., until they split up in 1998.
National Mortgage News disclosed that Moses “helped develop many of Fannie Mae’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs.
Critics charge that such programs led to the mortgage meltdown and the recent government takeover of Fannie Mae, according to Fox News, which noted that Fannie Mae and its financial cousin Freddie Mac “are blamed for spreading bad mortgages throughout the private financial sector.
In 1994, Frank thwarted efforts by President Clinton’s Department of Housing and Urban Development to impose new regulations on Fannie Mae.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Nothing Like Some Good Hate Mail!!!
This message was sent to my account earlier today on a gay chat site. The funniest thing is the claim that I'm the "hot tempered and angry" one.
daddabear: What a jerk! You are neither smart or successful until you can love your fellow human being... and its obvious you dont. you have a lot of hate and bitterness that you need to deal with man... just like your man mcInsane there.... hot tempered and angry!
You have what YOU want but you dont want anyone else to have what THEY want. Typical oximoran gay repugnant! YOURE AN ASSHOLE!!! You are a disgrace to ANYone gay or lesbian. Go find a woman and be done with it asswhipe!!!
*And I can tell that "daddabear" must be fully secure in his beliefs, since my attempt to respond to this tirade was unsuccessful since he BLOCKED me from mailing him back . . . oh well.
daddabear: What a jerk! You are neither smart or successful until you can love your fellow human being... and its obvious you dont. you have a lot of hate and bitterness that you need to deal with man... just like your man mcInsane there.... hot tempered and angry!
You have what YOU want but you dont want anyone else to have what THEY want. Typical oximoran gay repugnant! YOURE AN ASSHOLE!!! You are a disgrace to ANYone gay or lesbian. Go find a woman and be done with it asswhipe!!!
*And I can tell that "daddabear" must be fully secure in his beliefs, since my attempt to respond to this tirade was unsuccessful since he BLOCKED me from mailing him back . . . oh well.
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Obama, Rezko, & Corruption
Tony Rezko Shares Corruption Secrets
By MIKE ROBINSON, AP
(Oct. 11) - Jailed political fundraiser Antoin "Tony" Rezko, the Chicago real estate developer who helped launch Barack Obama on his political career, is whispering secrets to federal prosecutors about corruption in Illinois and the political fallout could be explosive.
Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, whose administration faces multiple federal investigations over how it handed out jobs and money with advice from Rezko, is considered the most vulnerable.
Rezko also was friendly with Obama — offering him a job when he finished law school, funding his earliest political campaigns and purchasing a lot next to his house. But based on the known facts, charges so far and testimony at Rezko's trial, there's no indication there'll be an October surprise that could hurt the Democratic presidential nominee — even though Rezko says prosecutors are pressing him for dirt about Obama.
"I think this strikes fear into the Blagojevich administration and the Statehouse Democrats but not into the Obama campaign," says state Sen. Kirk Dillard, R-Westmont, a John McCain delegate to the GOP convention but an old friend of Obama.
Rezko, 53, a real estate developer, was convicted in June of scheming to use his clout with the Blagojevich administration to squeeze $7 million in kickbacks out of a contractor and seven money management firms seeking to do business with the state.
Within two months, Rezko was seen in U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald's office, along with his attorneys.
There has been no official confirmation that Rezko is talking but his sentencing has been postponed indefinitely and both sides say they are going to "engage in discussions that could affect their sentencing postures.
"
"They never would have delayed the sentencing if he weren't talking — it's proof positive," said Jay Stewart, executive director of the Better Government Association of Chicago.
In addition, attorneys say federal investigators have been questioning Blagojevich contributions around the state using information that only Rezko could have supplied. Finally, courthouse personnel requesting anonymity because grand jury probes are secret said Rezko has been repeatedly brought from his cell to the U.S. attorney's office to talk to prosecutors.
Rezko could have a lot to tell. He has raised millions of dollars in campaign money for many Illinois politicians and according to federal prosecutors used his clout to control appointments to state boards.
Obama has sent to charity $159,000 that Rezko raised for his campaigns for the state legislature, the House and the Senate. Rezko raised nothing for Obama's White House run.
Obama's name came up in testimony at the trial four times, twice in connection with an obscure legislative memo, as a guest at a Rezko party and when defense attorney Joseph Duffy told jurors his client was a friend of the senator.
None of the witnesses accused the Democratic nominee for president of doing anything improper.
But questions concerning Obama's relationship with Rezko linger, particularly over Rezko's role in the purchase of the Obamas' home.
The two have known each other for years, starting when Rezko offered Obama a job after he graduated from Harvard Law School in 1991. Obama didn't take it, but a friendship developed.
The men talked politics frequently and occasionally dined together with their wives.
In 2005, the Obamas paid $1.65 million for their home near the University of Chicago. The sellers wanted a parcel they owned next door to sell on the same day, and Rezko's wife, Rita, was the buyer. At the request of the Obamas, Mrs. Rezko later sold them a 10-foot strip of land to enlarge their lot. They paid $104,500.
The deal took place while Rezko was under investigation and when details of the cozy relationship surfaced, Obama said it was a "bonehead" error to have asked for the additional land because it looked like he was getting a favor.
"I regret it," Obama said at the time. "I'm going to make sure that from this point on I don't even come close to the line.
"
McCain and vice running mate Sarah Palin have mentioned Rezko little if at all. But Republicans have aired a television ad focusing on Rezko. And McCain aides have repeatedly tweaked their opponent over the real estate deal in e-mails to reporters.
"We're delighted to have a debate on judgment with Barack Obama, who bought his million-dollar mansion in a shady deal with a convicted felon," McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said in August.
Blagojevich, meanwhile, got a black eye from the trial.
One witness testified that Blagojevich talked about hiring him for a major state job while his $25,000 donation to the governor's campaign fund was lying on the table.
Two attorneys testified that Blagojevich hinted that they could get lucrative state contracts if they raised money — possibly for a future White House campaign.
Obama's name has not surfaced in accounts of the investigation since the trial. But Rezko himself raised it in a letter to the judge months ago.
"Your Honor, the prosecutors have been overzealous in pursuing a crime that never happened," he wrote. "They are pressuring me to tell them the wrong things that I supposedly know about Gov. Blagojevich and Sen. Barack Obama.
"
By MIKE ROBINSON, AP
(Oct. 11) - Jailed political fundraiser Antoin "Tony" Rezko, the Chicago real estate developer who helped launch Barack Obama on his political career, is whispering secrets to federal prosecutors about corruption in Illinois and the political fallout could be explosive.
Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, whose administration faces multiple federal investigations over how it handed out jobs and money with advice from Rezko, is considered the most vulnerable.
Rezko also was friendly with Obama — offering him a job when he finished law school, funding his earliest political campaigns and purchasing a lot next to his house. But based on the known facts, charges so far and testimony at Rezko's trial, there's no indication there'll be an October surprise that could hurt the Democratic presidential nominee — even though Rezko says prosecutors are pressing him for dirt about Obama.
"I think this strikes fear into the Blagojevich administration and the Statehouse Democrats but not into the Obama campaign," says state Sen. Kirk Dillard, R-Westmont, a John McCain delegate to the GOP convention but an old friend of Obama.
Rezko, 53, a real estate developer, was convicted in June of scheming to use his clout with the Blagojevich administration to squeeze $7 million in kickbacks out of a contractor and seven money management firms seeking to do business with the state.
Within two months, Rezko was seen in U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald's office, along with his attorneys.
There has been no official confirmation that Rezko is talking but his sentencing has been postponed indefinitely and both sides say they are going to "engage in discussions that could affect their sentencing postures.
"
"They never would have delayed the sentencing if he weren't talking — it's proof positive," said Jay Stewart, executive director of the Better Government Association of Chicago.
In addition, attorneys say federal investigators have been questioning Blagojevich contributions around the state using information that only Rezko could have supplied. Finally, courthouse personnel requesting anonymity because grand jury probes are secret said Rezko has been repeatedly brought from his cell to the U.S. attorney's office to talk to prosecutors.
Rezko could have a lot to tell. He has raised millions of dollars in campaign money for many Illinois politicians and according to federal prosecutors used his clout to control appointments to state boards.
Obama has sent to charity $159,000 that Rezko raised for his campaigns for the state legislature, the House and the Senate. Rezko raised nothing for Obama's White House run.
Obama's name came up in testimony at the trial four times, twice in connection with an obscure legislative memo, as a guest at a Rezko party and when defense attorney Joseph Duffy told jurors his client was a friend of the senator.
None of the witnesses accused the Democratic nominee for president of doing anything improper.
But questions concerning Obama's relationship with Rezko linger, particularly over Rezko's role in the purchase of the Obamas' home.
The two have known each other for years, starting when Rezko offered Obama a job after he graduated from Harvard Law School in 1991. Obama didn't take it, but a friendship developed.
The men talked politics frequently and occasionally dined together with their wives.
In 2005, the Obamas paid $1.65 million for their home near the University of Chicago. The sellers wanted a parcel they owned next door to sell on the same day, and Rezko's wife, Rita, was the buyer. At the request of the Obamas, Mrs. Rezko later sold them a 10-foot strip of land to enlarge their lot. They paid $104,500.
The deal took place while Rezko was under investigation and when details of the cozy relationship surfaced, Obama said it was a "bonehead" error to have asked for the additional land because it looked like he was getting a favor.
"I regret it," Obama said at the time. "I'm going to make sure that from this point on I don't even come close to the line.
"
McCain and vice running mate Sarah Palin have mentioned Rezko little if at all. But Republicans have aired a television ad focusing on Rezko. And McCain aides have repeatedly tweaked their opponent over the real estate deal in e-mails to reporters.
"We're delighted to have a debate on judgment with Barack Obama, who bought his million-dollar mansion in a shady deal with a convicted felon," McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said in August.
Blagojevich, meanwhile, got a black eye from the trial.
One witness testified that Blagojevich talked about hiring him for a major state job while his $25,000 donation to the governor's campaign fund was lying on the table.
Two attorneys testified that Blagojevich hinted that they could get lucrative state contracts if they raised money — possibly for a future White House campaign.
Obama's name has not surfaced in accounts of the investigation since the trial. But Rezko himself raised it in a letter to the judge months ago.
"Your Honor, the prosecutors have been overzealous in pursuing a crime that never happened," he wrote. "They are pressuring me to tell them the wrong things that I supposedly know about Gov. Blagojevich and Sen. Barack Obama.
"
Friday, October 10, 2008
The Obama-Ayers Connection: Why We Should Care
EXCELLENT ARTICLE FROM FREEDOMVALUESRIGHTS.COM
I want to be very careful about what I am going to write. www.FreedomValuesRights.com was born with an intent to change the tone of political discussion in America. My intent is not to engage in red-meat, smear politics. We have enough of that in America. So be assured, that is not the intent of www.FreedomValuesRights.com in writing this entry.
Some people are asking, “Why should I be concerned about the Ayers, Obama connection?”
I think we should be concerned because there is a valid justification to be “reasonably concerned” about the Ayers, Obama connection. I’m not going to go into every detail of the situation here, because many have already covered this. My intent is to show why there is room for someone to be “reasonably concerned” about this situation.
We know Ayers is an unrepentant, domestic terrorist. He bombed government offices and doesn’t apologize for it. We know Obama started off his political career in his living room. Most know that Obama served with this guy on various causes and issues. It’s a proven fact that Obama even read and spoke positively about a book this guy wrote.
There are clear and undeniable political and social connections between these two men. So what does this mean? Does it mean Obama will listen to everything Ayers says? Does it mean Obama is for blowing up government offices? Does it mean Obama is a terrorist?
I don’t think it automatically means Obama loves terrorists and hates America. We can’t assume Obama believes everything this guy says, just because they served on some boards together. To reach those conclusions would do an injustice to reason and also to Obama. So you may be asking, “Then why should we be reasonably concerned about their connection?”
The office of President of The United States is one of the most important offices in the land. We must be careful about the person we elect to that place in government. Obama could hold this office.
It is fact that Ayers had the ear of Obama in the past. It is fact they served together. How can we be assured that this domestic terrorist won’t have Obama’s ear if Obama is elected to one of the most important offices in this land?
This is why we have cause to be “reasonably concerned” about the Obama, Ayers relationship. We don’t know for sure if Obama will listen to this guy. We don’t know for sure if Obama plans to keep a distance from him. There is just too much uncertainty.
The fact that a man like Ayers could have access to the highest office in the land, is justification to be “reasonably concerned” about Obama being elected. In the courts, reasonable doubt can keep a man from being convicted. Reasonable concern should at least make a voter think twice before voting for Obama.
Again the intent of www.FreedomValuesRights.com is not to smear Obama. I’m not saying Obama should be disqualified for all political offices and shunned out of existing in the public square. I’m just saying that reasonable concern exists that should make us all think twice about electing this guy to the highest office in the land.
A reasonable person can look at their connections and have valid justification to be reasonably concerned about Obama holding the highest office in The United States of America.
I want to be very careful about what I am going to write. www.FreedomValuesRights.com was born with an intent to change the tone of political discussion in America. My intent is not to engage in red-meat, smear politics. We have enough of that in America. So be assured, that is not the intent of www.FreedomValuesRights.com in writing this entry.
Some people are asking, “Why should I be concerned about the Ayers, Obama connection?”
I think we should be concerned because there is a valid justification to be “reasonably concerned” about the Ayers, Obama connection. I’m not going to go into every detail of the situation here, because many have already covered this. My intent is to show why there is room for someone to be “reasonably concerned” about this situation.
We know Ayers is an unrepentant, domestic terrorist. He bombed government offices and doesn’t apologize for it. We know Obama started off his political career in his living room. Most know that Obama served with this guy on various causes and issues. It’s a proven fact that Obama even read and spoke positively about a book this guy wrote.
There are clear and undeniable political and social connections between these two men. So what does this mean? Does it mean Obama will listen to everything Ayers says? Does it mean Obama is for blowing up government offices? Does it mean Obama is a terrorist?
I don’t think it automatically means Obama loves terrorists and hates America. We can’t assume Obama believes everything this guy says, just because they served on some boards together. To reach those conclusions would do an injustice to reason and also to Obama. So you may be asking, “Then why should we be reasonably concerned about their connection?”
The office of President of The United States is one of the most important offices in the land. We must be careful about the person we elect to that place in government. Obama could hold this office.
It is fact that Ayers had the ear of Obama in the past. It is fact they served together. How can we be assured that this domestic terrorist won’t have Obama’s ear if Obama is elected to one of the most important offices in this land?
This is why we have cause to be “reasonably concerned” about the Obama, Ayers relationship. We don’t know for sure if Obama will listen to this guy. We don’t know for sure if Obama plans to keep a distance from him. There is just too much uncertainty.
The fact that a man like Ayers could have access to the highest office in the land, is justification to be “reasonably concerned” about Obama being elected. In the courts, reasonable doubt can keep a man from being convicted. Reasonable concern should at least make a voter think twice before voting for Obama.
Again the intent of www.FreedomValuesRights.com is not to smear Obama. I’m not saying Obama should be disqualified for all political offices and shunned out of existing in the public square. I’m just saying that reasonable concern exists that should make us all think twice about electing this guy to the highest office in the land.
A reasonable person can look at their connections and have valid justification to be reasonably concerned about Obama holding the highest office in The United States of America.
THE GREAT OBAMA!!!
Obama's Magic
By Kimberley Strassel
WALL STREET JOURNAL
And now, America, we introduce the Great Obama! The world's most gifted political magician! A thing of wonder. A thing of awe. Just watch him defy politics, economics, even gravity! (And hold your applause until the end, please.
)
To kick off our show tonight, Mr. Obama will give 95% of American working families a tax cut, even though 40% of Americans today don't pay income taxes! How can our star enact such mathemagic? How can he "cut" zero? Abracadabra! It's called a "refundable tax credit." It involves the federal government taking money from those who do pay taxes, and writing checks to those who don't. Yes, yes, in the real world this is known as "welfare," but please try not to ruin the show.
For his next trick, the Great Obama will jumpstart the economy, and he'll do it by raising taxes on the very businesses that are today adrift in a financial tsunami! That will include all those among the top 1% of taxpayers who are in fact small-business owners, and the nation's biggest employers who currently pay some of the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world. Mr. Obama will, with a flick of his fingers, show them how to create more jobs with less money. It's simple, really. He has a wand.
Next up, Mr. Obama will re-regulate the economy, with no ill effects whatsoever! You may have heard that for the past 40 years most politicians believed deregulation was good for the U.S. economy. You might have even heard that much of today's financial mess tracks to loose money policy, or Fannie and Freddie excesses. Our magician will show the fault was instead with our failure to clamp down on innovation and risk-taking, and will fix this with new, all-encompassing rules.
Presto!
Did someone in the audience just shout "Sarbanes Oxley?" Usher, can you remove that man? Thank you. Mr. Obama will now demonstrate how he gives Americans the "choice" of a "voluntary" government health plan, designed in such a way as to crowd out the private market and eliminate all other choice! Don't worry people: You won't have to join, until you do. Mr. Obama will follow this with a demonstration of how his plan will differ from our failing Medicare program. Oops, sorry, folks. The Great Obama just reminded me it is time for an intermission. Maybe we'll get to that marvel later.
We're back now. And just watch the Great Obama perform a feat never yet managed in all history. He will create that enormous new government health program, spend billions to transform our energy economy, provide financial assistance to former Soviet satellites, invest in infrastructure, increase education spending, provide job training assistance, and give 95% of Americans a tax (ahem) cut -- all without raising the deficit a single penny! And he'll do it in the middle of a financial crisis.
And with falling tax revenues! Voila!
Moving along to a little ventriloquism. Study his mouth carefully, folks: It looks like he's saying "I'll stop the special interests," when in fact the words coming out are "Welcome to Washington, friends!" Wind and solar companies, ethanol makers, tort lawyers, unions, community organizers -- all are welcome to feed at the public trough and to request special favors. From now on "special interests" will only refer to universally despised, if utterly crucial, economic players. Say, oil companies.
Hocus Pocus!
And for tonight's finale, the Great Obama will uphold America's "moral" obligation to "stop genocide" by abandoning Iraq! While teleported to the region, he will simultaneously convince Iranian leaders to peacefully abandon their nuclear pursuits (even as he does not sit down with them), fix Afghanistan with a strategy that does not resemble the Iraqi surge, and (drumroll!) pull Osama bin Laden out of his hat!
Tada!
You can clap now. (Applause. Cheers.) We'd like to thank a few people in the audience. Namely, Republican presidential nominee John McCain, who has so admirably restrained himself from running up on stage to debunk any of these illusions and spoil everyone's fun.
We know he's in a bit of a box, having initially blamed today's financial crisis on corporate "greed," and thus made it that much harder to call for a corporate tax cut, or warn against excessive regulation. Still, there were some pretty big openings up here this evening, and he let them alone! We'd also like to thank Mr. McCain for keeping all the focus on himself these past weeks. It has helped the Great Obama to just get on with the show.
As for that show, we'd love to invite you all back for next week's performance, when the Great Obama will thrill with new, amazing exploits. He will respect your Second Amendment rights even as he regulates firearms! He will renegotiate Nafta, even as he supports free trade! He will.
By Kimberley Strassel
WALL STREET JOURNAL
And now, America, we introduce the Great Obama! The world's most gifted political magician! A thing of wonder. A thing of awe. Just watch him defy politics, economics, even gravity! (And hold your applause until the end, please.
)
To kick off our show tonight, Mr. Obama will give 95% of American working families a tax cut, even though 40% of Americans today don't pay income taxes! How can our star enact such mathemagic? How can he "cut" zero? Abracadabra! It's called a "refundable tax credit." It involves the federal government taking money from those who do pay taxes, and writing checks to those who don't. Yes, yes, in the real world this is known as "welfare," but please try not to ruin the show.
For his next trick, the Great Obama will jumpstart the economy, and he'll do it by raising taxes on the very businesses that are today adrift in a financial tsunami! That will include all those among the top 1% of taxpayers who are in fact small-business owners, and the nation's biggest employers who currently pay some of the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world. Mr. Obama will, with a flick of his fingers, show them how to create more jobs with less money. It's simple, really. He has a wand.
Next up, Mr. Obama will re-regulate the economy, with no ill effects whatsoever! You may have heard that for the past 40 years most politicians believed deregulation was good for the U.S. economy. You might have even heard that much of today's financial mess tracks to loose money policy, or Fannie and Freddie excesses. Our magician will show the fault was instead with our failure to clamp down on innovation and risk-taking, and will fix this with new, all-encompassing rules.
Presto!
Did someone in the audience just shout "Sarbanes Oxley?" Usher, can you remove that man? Thank you. Mr. Obama will now demonstrate how he gives Americans the "choice" of a "voluntary" government health plan, designed in such a way as to crowd out the private market and eliminate all other choice! Don't worry people: You won't have to join, until you do. Mr. Obama will follow this with a demonstration of how his plan will differ from our failing Medicare program. Oops, sorry, folks. The Great Obama just reminded me it is time for an intermission. Maybe we'll get to that marvel later.
We're back now. And just watch the Great Obama perform a feat never yet managed in all history. He will create that enormous new government health program, spend billions to transform our energy economy, provide financial assistance to former Soviet satellites, invest in infrastructure, increase education spending, provide job training assistance, and give 95% of Americans a tax (ahem) cut -- all without raising the deficit a single penny! And he'll do it in the middle of a financial crisis.
And with falling tax revenues! Voila!
Moving along to a little ventriloquism. Study his mouth carefully, folks: It looks like he's saying "I'll stop the special interests," when in fact the words coming out are "Welcome to Washington, friends!" Wind and solar companies, ethanol makers, tort lawyers, unions, community organizers -- all are welcome to feed at the public trough and to request special favors. From now on "special interests" will only refer to universally despised, if utterly crucial, economic players. Say, oil companies.
Hocus Pocus!
And for tonight's finale, the Great Obama will uphold America's "moral" obligation to "stop genocide" by abandoning Iraq! While teleported to the region, he will simultaneously convince Iranian leaders to peacefully abandon their nuclear pursuits (even as he does not sit down with them), fix Afghanistan with a strategy that does not resemble the Iraqi surge, and (drumroll!) pull Osama bin Laden out of his hat!
Tada!
You can clap now. (Applause. Cheers.) We'd like to thank a few people in the audience. Namely, Republican presidential nominee John McCain, who has so admirably restrained himself from running up on stage to debunk any of these illusions and spoil everyone's fun.
We know he's in a bit of a box, having initially blamed today's financial crisis on corporate "greed," and thus made it that much harder to call for a corporate tax cut, or warn against excessive regulation. Still, there were some pretty big openings up here this evening, and he let them alone! We'd also like to thank Mr. McCain for keeping all the focus on himself these past weeks. It has helped the Great Obama to just get on with the show.
As for that show, we'd love to invite you all back for next week's performance, when the Great Obama will thrill with new, amazing exploits. He will respect your Second Amendment rights even as he regulates firearms! He will renegotiate Nafta, even as he supports free trade! He will.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Federal Judge Orders Obama To Produce Birth Certificate!!!
One of Pennsylvania's most prominent Democrats, attorney Phillip Berg, has sought an injunction in federal court to remove Barack Obama's name from the presidential ballot on the grounds that he is not a natural born United States citizen, and therefore ineligible to become president.
In a recent ruling, the judge not only denied a motion by Obama's attorneys to dismiss the case, but also ordered that Obama immediately produce the following to Mr. Berg so that he may proceed with his pursuit of the injunction:
1.) A certified copy of his ORIGINAL long version birth certificate
2.) A certified copy of his "Certification of Citizenship"
3.) A certified copy of his "Oath of Allegiance"
Ironically, I guess you could say that "what goes around comes around." Obama actually won his first election to the Illinois State Senate by having his two opponents removed from the ballot (including the black female incumbent) on "legal technicalities" regarding the validity of signatures they submitted to get their names on the ballot. However, if it turns out that Berg's allegations are true, we have a blatant constitutional violation, and Obama has attempted to commit a FRAUD upon the American people. You can read the judge's order here:
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/13/0.pdf
Again, it's one of Obama's fellow DEMOCRATS who is bringing this action. Hang on folks, this may be a mighty bumpy ride!!!
In a recent ruling, the judge not only denied a motion by Obama's attorneys to dismiss the case, but also ordered that Obama immediately produce the following to Mr. Berg so that he may proceed with his pursuit of the injunction:
1.) A certified copy of his ORIGINAL long version birth certificate
2.) A certified copy of his "Certification of Citizenship"
3.) A certified copy of his "Oath of Allegiance"
Ironically, I guess you could say that "what goes around comes around." Obama actually won his first election to the Illinois State Senate by having his two opponents removed from the ballot (including the black female incumbent) on "legal technicalities" regarding the validity of signatures they submitted to get their names on the ballot. However, if it turns out that Berg's allegations are true, we have a blatant constitutional violation, and Obama has attempted to commit a FRAUD upon the American people. You can read the judge's order here:
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/13/0.pdf
Again, it's one of Obama's fellow DEMOCRATS who is bringing this action. Hang on folks, this may be a mighty bumpy ride!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)