I've been trying to convince people that all this talk by the Democrats about being more sensitive towards the rights of women, blacks, gays, and other minorities is flat out nonsense . They just pretend to care simply because they want the minority vote.
The wonderful thing about this election is that the Democrats are FINALLY exposing their true colors for all to see. First of all, they snub one of their own prominent members for the presidential nomination, and then snub her again for the VP nomination. Then when the Republicans nominte a female VP, the Democrats attack her with many of the same sexist epithets they normally denounce (with no liberal feminist group coming to her rescue, not that Sarah Palin needs it or wants it lol).
Looking back, remember that the first woman to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court was nominated by a REPUBLICAN, and the only African-American currently sitting on the high court was also nominted by a REPUBLICAN.
So America finally gets to witness, first hand, the utter hypocrisy of the Democrats and how they end up betraying the very minority groups whose rights they claim to support. Believe it or not, I actually in a way feel sorry for Barack Obama, as a recent article I cite below points out that such racist betrayal by many whites in his own party might be what ends up costing him the election.
Although I sure hope that Obama loses the election, he shouldn't lose because of the color of his skin, but because he'd be a flat out horrible president who, among other things, would raise our taxes and place America's security at risk.
As Obama himself would say, a pig can be black, white, green, purple, or blue, but it's still a pig!
http://news. aol. com/article/racial-views-may-cost-obama-election/181935?icid=100214839x1209710216x1200549293
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Friday, September 19, 2008
A Gay Man's Case Against Gay Marriage
Yup, that's what the headline says.
You aren't that drunk or hallucinated yet lol
I'll say it very clearly: I AM A GAY MAN, AND I OPPOSE GAY "MARRIAGE.
" Now, promise me that before you brand me a traitor or accuse me of being a gay "Uncle Tom," at least listen to what I have to say, fair enough?
First of all, if you’re really in love with someone, why the hell do you need a piece of paper to prove that? All it means is that when the relationship sours, your partner gets to take half of what you’ve worked so hard to earn (especially if you’re in a community property state like CA- just ask Jessica Simpson).
Most of my str8 friends tell me that society is actually doing gays a favor by not allowing us to get legally married and be forced to suffer the same misery lol
Regardless of how much of a hypocrite I might seem, I think that our state Supreme Court decision earlier this year was completely WRONG. I have actually read the decision in its entirety (from a legal persepctive and not a "gay" perspective) and it is filled with errors and misapplications of precedent, a clear example of overzealous judges overstepping their bounds and succumbing to cultural whims rather than using proper restraint and following the law. Californians have an opportunity on election day, as voters in a democracy (imagine that), to overturn the decision and I sure hope that we do. Either way, there is no way the decision will stand if, heaven forbid, it goes to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In California, same sex couples can register with the state as domestic partners and receive almost all of the benefits a legally married couple get without it actually being called marriage. Even in other states, all it takes is a visit to an attorney to draft some forms (i.e. power of attorney, living will, etc.) and it’s almost just as if you were husband and wife. When I lived in Arizona, I knew a lesbian attorney whose entire practice consisted of providing these services to same-sex couples.
I do not believe this relegates us to second class citizens, as long as civil unions and domestic partnerships are available. By demanding marriage rights, gays and lesbians are claiming entitlement to something that was simply never intended for them, not due to bigotry or prejudice, but rather the nature of marriage itself as an institution.
As I like to (and need to) frequently remind so many of fellow gay men, "It’s not about you!"
To compare, I am sure that a lot of str8 men would love to be allowed to go into the ladies’ restroom, but they aren’t because any ladies restroom, since its opening, was intended for ladies only. As long as the men have their own restroom, even if they would rather go into the ladies room, this certainly doesn’t make men second class citizens or constitute "separate but equal." No one would dare proffer such a silly argument. It’s just simple common sense that a ladies restroom is for ladies only, just as it is simple common sense (not "homophobia") that marriage as an institution was always intended, and should always be intended, for ONE man and ONE woman. As a gay man, this does not make me feel inferior whatsoever, in the same way that it does not make me feel inferior that I am not allowed to purchase a home in a 55+ retirement community, or be hired to model female bikinis (sorry to disappoint all of you), or have to stand in the long line everytime I go through customs at a European airport. Oh, and how dare the manager at McDonald’s tell me I’m not allowed anymore to play in the children’s play area and jump in the ball pit.
I am going to hire the ACLU and sue!
*Oh, and contrary to popular belief, Sarah Palin did NOT oppose domestic partner benefits for Alaska state employees. I exchanged e-mails last night with a lady who actually works for the state of Alaska, and she says that her gay and lesbian colleagues have always received such benefits. It never ceases to amaze me, especially in this particular campaign, how the media blurs the line between perception and reality, and how so many of us are still falling for it hookline and sinker. I’m working on a blog posting this weekend on that very subject.
This ought to generate some lively conversation, can’t wait to hear your thoughts =)
You aren't that drunk or hallucinated yet lol
I'll say it very clearly: I AM A GAY MAN, AND I OPPOSE GAY "MARRIAGE.
" Now, promise me that before you brand me a traitor or accuse me of being a gay "Uncle Tom," at least listen to what I have to say, fair enough?
First of all, if you’re really in love with someone, why the hell do you need a piece of paper to prove that? All it means is that when the relationship sours, your partner gets to take half of what you’ve worked so hard to earn (especially if you’re in a community property state like CA- just ask Jessica Simpson).
Most of my str8 friends tell me that society is actually doing gays a favor by not allowing us to get legally married and be forced to suffer the same misery lol
Regardless of how much of a hypocrite I might seem, I think that our state Supreme Court decision earlier this year was completely WRONG. I have actually read the decision in its entirety (from a legal persepctive and not a "gay" perspective) and it is filled with errors and misapplications of precedent, a clear example of overzealous judges overstepping their bounds and succumbing to cultural whims rather than using proper restraint and following the law. Californians have an opportunity on election day, as voters in a democracy (imagine that), to overturn the decision and I sure hope that we do. Either way, there is no way the decision will stand if, heaven forbid, it goes to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In California, same sex couples can register with the state as domestic partners and receive almost all of the benefits a legally married couple get without it actually being called marriage. Even in other states, all it takes is a visit to an attorney to draft some forms (i.e. power of attorney, living will, etc.) and it’s almost just as if you were husband and wife. When I lived in Arizona, I knew a lesbian attorney whose entire practice consisted of providing these services to same-sex couples.
I do not believe this relegates us to second class citizens, as long as civil unions and domestic partnerships are available. By demanding marriage rights, gays and lesbians are claiming entitlement to something that was simply never intended for them, not due to bigotry or prejudice, but rather the nature of marriage itself as an institution.
As I like to (and need to) frequently remind so many of fellow gay men, "It’s not about you!"
To compare, I am sure that a lot of str8 men would love to be allowed to go into the ladies’ restroom, but they aren’t because any ladies restroom, since its opening, was intended for ladies only. As long as the men have their own restroom, even if they would rather go into the ladies room, this certainly doesn’t make men second class citizens or constitute "separate but equal." No one would dare proffer such a silly argument. It’s just simple common sense that a ladies restroom is for ladies only, just as it is simple common sense (not "homophobia") that marriage as an institution was always intended, and should always be intended, for ONE man and ONE woman. As a gay man, this does not make me feel inferior whatsoever, in the same way that it does not make me feel inferior that I am not allowed to purchase a home in a 55+ retirement community, or be hired to model female bikinis (sorry to disappoint all of you), or have to stand in the long line everytime I go through customs at a European airport. Oh, and how dare the manager at McDonald’s tell me I’m not allowed anymore to play in the children’s play area and jump in the ball pit.
I am going to hire the ACLU and sue!
*Oh, and contrary to popular belief, Sarah Palin did NOT oppose domestic partner benefits for Alaska state employees. I exchanged e-mails last night with a lady who actually works for the state of Alaska, and she says that her gay and lesbian colleagues have always received such benefits. It never ceases to amaze me, especially in this particular campaign, how the media blurs the line between perception and reality, and how so many of us are still falling for it hookline and sinker. I’m working on a blog posting this weekend on that very subject.
This ought to generate some lively conversation, can’t wait to hear your thoughts =)
Thursday, September 18, 2008
The Jewish Case For John McCain
This is what "Jews for McCain" say on their MySpace profile. It's definitely worth reading:
Quote from Obama's Book- "The Audacity of Hope" : "I WILL STAND WITH THE MUSLIMS SHOULD THE POLITICAL WINDS SHIFT IN AN UGLY DIRECTION. " - BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Jewish Americans for McCain '08 consider Israel's protection a priority. Senator McCain has stated many times that he would protect Israel and not tolerate any attacks. With Iran's threats of building nuclear bombs, Senator McCain has made it clear that if he is elected President, he will allow Israel to protect themselves and will assist them in the fight against these Islamic extremists planning on mass murder. On the other hand, Senator Obama has already stated that he would not tolerate Israel fighting Iran back and believes that America should "stand back and provide and example of peace". To create peace, you must fight off the ones planning on destroying it! Sitting back and allowing Israel to be wiped off the map, is not the peaceful thing to do. Senator Obama is all words, no action. All of a sudden when he needed the Jewish vote, he starts saying he supports Israel. Yet, he still admitted that he would meet with Iranian leaders, while both Senator Clinton and Senator McCain said they would not meet with them until their threats had stopped. In additon, Senator Obama still has not claimed that he would engage in full protection of Israel! He has only stated "I support Israel" after his advisors told him that he needed the Jewish vote. Well, Actions speak louder than words and we cannot let Israel be destroyed by sitting back and doing nothing. We are not racist, nor are we against Obama because we believe that he is "muslim". However, we are accusing him of not taking action to help Israel because of his radical liberal beliefs of staying out of war. Sitting back is the same thing as allowing Israel to be destroyed. It is allowing a second Holocaust to happen. Israel was created so that the Jews could feel secure and know that no Holocaust would ever happen again.
NEVER AGAIN. Never again should the Jews be mass murdered. You cannot be a good commander in chief if you do not protect your important allies!
Senator Obama does not have the experience to lead this nation as commander in chief, while McCain does. Foreign policy is Senator Obama's weakest point and now is not the time to be taking risks on some young idealistic rookie. While many Jews are democrats (including the ones who created this page and Senator Joe Lieberman), we understand that Israel's safety is imperative right now and voting for Senator McCain ensures us of this. In addition, it pleases the democratic Jews to know that Senator McCain is more of a liberal Republican (so much that many conservative Republicans do not like him). His close friendships with many democrats (such as the Clintons) proves this. While, most of us Jewish Democrats wanted Senator Clinton to be President in '08 and admit that she was our first choice, we understand that there is only one candidate right now who will fight for Israel's safety. The fact that there is a democratic majority in Congress also keeps our minds at peace knowing that they will not allow McCain to make any extreme Republican changes. This is not just a group for Jewish Americans, this is a group for those who support Israel. You do not need to be a religious Jew, you may just appreciate your heritage, your family, your people and that is why you are supporting Israel. You don't need to be Jewish at all to want to stand up for one of America's most important allies. This is not only defending Israel, but it is defending the United States in the long run. By not tolerating any attack on Israel from these Islamic extremists, you are not tolerating terrorism. PLEASE VOTE MCCAIN '08 TO PROTECT ISRAEL!!!!!
The Jewish Connecticut Democratic senator Joe Lieberman, decided to endorse McCain because he considers him "the most capable to be commander in chief on day one of his administration, and the most capable of uniting the country so that we can prevail against Islamic extremism," a Lieberman aide said earlier.
From Israel National News:
Why should strongly traditional Democratic Jews change and vote for the Republican John McCain? Because he is the best candidate, with a pro-Israel bias and a proven track record, with military experience and knowledge. In other words, he is the real thing. Not a bunch of buzz words like "change" and "hope". McCain has a solid foundation and groundwork to build upon. He is the genuine real deal. Not a bunch of rhetoric, but solid substance.
Throughout his 25 years as a US Congressman and Senator, John McCain has clearly demonstrated a breadth and depth of support on critical issues; not only with his words, but with his actions. He is no newcomer to these issues, nor even to the Jewish state. Sen. McCain has visited Israel many times, dating back to his days as a Naval officer and as recently as March 2008.
Sen. McCain has consistently and publicly advocated for critical and necessary legislation, even when it was less popular. Early in his political career, during 1985, Sen. McCain sponsored legislation urging Egypt to honor the Camp David Accords - Egypt’s historic peace agreement with Israel, in which Israel gave up land equivalent geographically to three times the total land mass of Israel in exchange for peace.
During 1987, he supported Senate Resolution 205, signed into law by President Reagan, which called for the overturn of the United Nation’s infamous proclamation equating “Zionism with Racism” sponsored by the Arab League of Nations.
During 1991, when Israel showed considerable restraint by not retaliating against Saddam Hussein as SCUD missiles rained down upon civilians under siege, Sen. McCain supported the resolution recognizing Israel’s right to defend itself and America’s promise to help Israel maintain its safety, security and freedom.
Sen. McCain also stood up to leaders and political pressure within his own political party to tie together loans and funding to Israel.
During 2000, Sen. McCain strongly advocated the renewal of the Iran-Syria Sanctions Act.
Sen. McCain enjoys an excellent relationship with many Israeli elected leaders and officials, including but not limited to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister (and former Prime Minister) Ehud Barak.
Sen. McCain understands and can discuss fluently the history of Israel ’s wars, the geography of the borders, and the moral values at the very core of the strategic alliance between the US and Israel.
But it is perhaps Sen. McCain’s grasp and great understanding of the serious threat of the spread of radical Islam that has made him such a staunch supporter and ally of Israel.
Sen. McCain clearly stands apart from his opponent Barack Hussein Obama. His clarity is evident in both actions and words. Responding to the rants and raves of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, McCain made his position clear: “I intend to make unmistakably clear to Iran, we will not permit a government that espouses the destruction of the State of Israel as its fondest wish and pledges undying enmity to the United States to possess the weapons to advance their malevolent ambitions.”
According to the former Democratic Vice Presidential candidate and Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT), “John McCain has proven that we can trust him to do what is right for the country, not only when it is easy, but when it is hard; to do what is necessary, not only when it is popular, but when it is not; and to tell us the truth, not only when it is easy to hear, but when it is not.... He will push all of us to work together to solve our biggest problems, and defeat our most dangerous enemies.”
Time and time again, McCain proves both with actions and words his strong support for Israel. And not just when it is convenient and politically correct to do so,(like Obama).
One can clearly see McCain’s proven track record shows he is the best candidate for America ’s Commander-in-Chief and President of the United States. McCain is the real deal for leadership in turbulent times. A true blue friend and staunch supporter of the American Jewish community and Israel.
Quote from Obama's Book- "The Audacity of Hope" : "I WILL STAND WITH THE MUSLIMS SHOULD THE POLITICAL WINDS SHIFT IN AN UGLY DIRECTION. " - BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Jewish Americans for McCain '08 consider Israel's protection a priority. Senator McCain has stated many times that he would protect Israel and not tolerate any attacks. With Iran's threats of building nuclear bombs, Senator McCain has made it clear that if he is elected President, he will allow Israel to protect themselves and will assist them in the fight against these Islamic extremists planning on mass murder. On the other hand, Senator Obama has already stated that he would not tolerate Israel fighting Iran back and believes that America should "stand back and provide and example of peace". To create peace, you must fight off the ones planning on destroying it! Sitting back and allowing Israel to be wiped off the map, is not the peaceful thing to do. Senator Obama is all words, no action. All of a sudden when he needed the Jewish vote, he starts saying he supports Israel. Yet, he still admitted that he would meet with Iranian leaders, while both Senator Clinton and Senator McCain said they would not meet with them until their threats had stopped. In additon, Senator Obama still has not claimed that he would engage in full protection of Israel! He has only stated "I support Israel" after his advisors told him that he needed the Jewish vote. Well, Actions speak louder than words and we cannot let Israel be destroyed by sitting back and doing nothing. We are not racist, nor are we against Obama because we believe that he is "muslim". However, we are accusing him of not taking action to help Israel because of his radical liberal beliefs of staying out of war. Sitting back is the same thing as allowing Israel to be destroyed. It is allowing a second Holocaust to happen. Israel was created so that the Jews could feel secure and know that no Holocaust would ever happen again.
NEVER AGAIN. Never again should the Jews be mass murdered. You cannot be a good commander in chief if you do not protect your important allies!
Senator Obama does not have the experience to lead this nation as commander in chief, while McCain does. Foreign policy is Senator Obama's weakest point and now is not the time to be taking risks on some young idealistic rookie. While many Jews are democrats (including the ones who created this page and Senator Joe Lieberman), we understand that Israel's safety is imperative right now and voting for Senator McCain ensures us of this. In addition, it pleases the democratic Jews to know that Senator McCain is more of a liberal Republican (so much that many conservative Republicans do not like him). His close friendships with many democrats (such as the Clintons) proves this. While, most of us Jewish Democrats wanted Senator Clinton to be President in '08 and admit that she was our first choice, we understand that there is only one candidate right now who will fight for Israel's safety. The fact that there is a democratic majority in Congress also keeps our minds at peace knowing that they will not allow McCain to make any extreme Republican changes. This is not just a group for Jewish Americans, this is a group for those who support Israel. You do not need to be a religious Jew, you may just appreciate your heritage, your family, your people and that is why you are supporting Israel. You don't need to be Jewish at all to want to stand up for one of America's most important allies. This is not only defending Israel, but it is defending the United States in the long run. By not tolerating any attack on Israel from these Islamic extremists, you are not tolerating terrorism. PLEASE VOTE MCCAIN '08 TO PROTECT ISRAEL!!!!!
The Jewish Connecticut Democratic senator Joe Lieberman, decided to endorse McCain because he considers him "the most capable to be commander in chief on day one of his administration, and the most capable of uniting the country so that we can prevail against Islamic extremism," a Lieberman aide said earlier.
From Israel National News:
Why should strongly traditional Democratic Jews change and vote for the Republican John McCain? Because he is the best candidate, with a pro-Israel bias and a proven track record, with military experience and knowledge. In other words, he is the real thing. Not a bunch of buzz words like "change" and "hope". McCain has a solid foundation and groundwork to build upon. He is the genuine real deal. Not a bunch of rhetoric, but solid substance.
Throughout his 25 years as a US Congressman and Senator, John McCain has clearly demonstrated a breadth and depth of support on critical issues; not only with his words, but with his actions. He is no newcomer to these issues, nor even to the Jewish state. Sen. McCain has visited Israel many times, dating back to his days as a Naval officer and as recently as March 2008.
Sen. McCain has consistently and publicly advocated for critical and necessary legislation, even when it was less popular. Early in his political career, during 1985, Sen. McCain sponsored legislation urging Egypt to honor the Camp David Accords - Egypt’s historic peace agreement with Israel, in which Israel gave up land equivalent geographically to three times the total land mass of Israel in exchange for peace.
During 1987, he supported Senate Resolution 205, signed into law by President Reagan, which called for the overturn of the United Nation’s infamous proclamation equating “Zionism with Racism” sponsored by the Arab League of Nations.
During 1991, when Israel showed considerable restraint by not retaliating against Saddam Hussein as SCUD missiles rained down upon civilians under siege, Sen. McCain supported the resolution recognizing Israel’s right to defend itself and America’s promise to help Israel maintain its safety, security and freedom.
Sen. McCain also stood up to leaders and political pressure within his own political party to tie together loans and funding to Israel.
During 2000, Sen. McCain strongly advocated the renewal of the Iran-Syria Sanctions Act.
Sen. McCain enjoys an excellent relationship with many Israeli elected leaders and officials, including but not limited to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister (and former Prime Minister) Ehud Barak.
Sen. McCain understands and can discuss fluently the history of Israel ’s wars, the geography of the borders, and the moral values at the very core of the strategic alliance between the US and Israel.
But it is perhaps Sen. McCain’s grasp and great understanding of the serious threat of the spread of radical Islam that has made him such a staunch supporter and ally of Israel.
Sen. McCain clearly stands apart from his opponent Barack Hussein Obama. His clarity is evident in both actions and words. Responding to the rants and raves of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, McCain made his position clear: “I intend to make unmistakably clear to Iran, we will not permit a government that espouses the destruction of the State of Israel as its fondest wish and pledges undying enmity to the United States to possess the weapons to advance their malevolent ambitions.”
According to the former Democratic Vice Presidential candidate and Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT), “John McCain has proven that we can trust him to do what is right for the country, not only when it is easy, but when it is hard; to do what is necessary, not only when it is popular, but when it is not; and to tell us the truth, not only when it is easy to hear, but when it is not.... He will push all of us to work together to solve our biggest problems, and defeat our most dangerous enemies.”
Time and time again, McCain proves both with actions and words his strong support for Israel. And not just when it is convenient and politically correct to do so,(like Obama).
One can clearly see McCain’s proven track record shows he is the best candidate for America ’s Commander-in-Chief and President of the United States. McCain is the real deal for leadership in turbulent times. A true blue friend and staunch supporter of the American Jewish community and Israel.
Those Desert Folks Are Mighty Smart!
I was in Palm Springs this past weekend, and came across two very well written Letters to the Editor in the local paper. Thought I'd share them with all of you:
Obama's link to Ayers
Why is the media ignoring Barack Obama's connection to a radical professor who once engaged in terrorist activity?
Long before I ever heard the name Barack Obama, I knew the name William Ayers. Ayers was a rich kid turned domestic terrorist.
He helped found the radical Weather Underground and was responsible for bombings of the Capitol Building, the Pentagon and a police station.
Ayers' followers would go on to commit murder during a bank robbery.
Like many rich kids, Ayers was able to escape prosecution for his violent acts.
Since the 1980s, Ayers has been an education professor devoting his time to an extremist education philosophy that seeks to infuse radical Marxist worldview into America's K-12 curriculum.
Obama has been a friend and associate of Ayers for years. The two have served together on the board of a left-wing foundation, and Ayers chose Obama to work on one of his education “reform” organizations. Sen. Obama's political career literally began at a meet-and-greet in Ayers' living room.
Here we have a clear case of a presidential candidate who has close associations with a hateful extremist, yet the media refuse to look at the story.
John Miller
Palm Desert
A Woman of Substance
As a woman, and a proud Republican, I am insulted by some of your contributors' letters such as “don't be fooled, women.” There are still those out there, some women I believe to be bitter, and many men who still have us in a “box,“ telling us what to do, think, and who to vote for.
Dan Quayle was weak and George W. has not proven to be anyone's favorite. How about Bill Clinton and Monica?
Is that OK? It must be that he didn't inhale.
We keep hearing how old John McCain is, Joe Biden is tried and tired. Obama is a wonderful speaker, self assured, but empty.
Considering all of his talent he'd sell better on a soap opera than as leader of this great nation. I was inspired by John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin, and now that I've heard her, even more.
Get out of the box girls, don't be fooled by rhetoric!
Once again I'm proud to be voting Republican, and for candidates with real substance.
Alice Broich
Cathedral City
Obama's link to Ayers
Why is the media ignoring Barack Obama's connection to a radical professor who once engaged in terrorist activity?
Long before I ever heard the name Barack Obama, I knew the name William Ayers. Ayers was a rich kid turned domestic terrorist.
He helped found the radical Weather Underground and was responsible for bombings of the Capitol Building, the Pentagon and a police station.
Ayers' followers would go on to commit murder during a bank robbery.
Like many rich kids, Ayers was able to escape prosecution for his violent acts.
Since the 1980s, Ayers has been an education professor devoting his time to an extremist education philosophy that seeks to infuse radical Marxist worldview into America's K-12 curriculum.
Obama has been a friend and associate of Ayers for years. The two have served together on the board of a left-wing foundation, and Ayers chose Obama to work on one of his education “reform” organizations. Sen. Obama's political career literally began at a meet-and-greet in Ayers' living room.
Here we have a clear case of a presidential candidate who has close associations with a hateful extremist, yet the media refuse to look at the story.
John Miller
Palm Desert
A Woman of Substance
As a woman, and a proud Republican, I am insulted by some of your contributors' letters such as “don't be fooled, women.” There are still those out there, some women I believe to be bitter, and many men who still have us in a “box,“ telling us what to do, think, and who to vote for.
Dan Quayle was weak and George W. has not proven to be anyone's favorite. How about Bill Clinton and Monica?
Is that OK? It must be that he didn't inhale.
We keep hearing how old John McCain is, Joe Biden is tried and tired. Obama is a wonderful speaker, self assured, but empty.
Considering all of his talent he'd sell better on a soap opera than as leader of this great nation. I was inspired by John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin, and now that I've heard her, even more.
Get out of the box girls, don't be fooled by rhetoric!
Once again I'm proud to be voting Republican, and for candidates with real substance.
Alice Broich
Cathedral City
BIDEN: Paying Higher Taxes Is "Patriotic"
Are you kidding me????
Read for yourself and have vomit bag on hand . . .
http://news. yahoo. com/s/ap/20080918/ap_on_el_pr/biden_taxes_3
Read for yourself and have vomit bag on hand . . .
http://news. yahoo. com/s/ap/20080918/ap_on_el_pr/biden_taxes_3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)